$8.4M ± $2.1M
Conversion all-in, Snapshot tier
Property
Best Western (target: Hampton H4) · 96 keys · Pacific Northwest
Conversion
Delivery
Snapshot · 22-hour turnaround
Snapshot screen on a Best Western → Hampton conversion
A regional sponsor under LOI on a 96-key Best Western in the Pacific Northwest needed to know whether a Hampton H4 conversion pencil was realistic before committing to 30 days of deep diligence. Snapshot delivered a defensible range in under 24 hours. The sponsor passed on the deal.
Read the full scenario
The situation
The sponsor had a signed LOI on a 96-key Best Western in a secondary Pacific Northwest market. Their thesis was conversion to Hampton H4 based on trailing ADR comp-set analysis. The lender wanted a cost number before the LOI's 45-day inspection period closed.
What was ordered
A Snapshot. The decision at hand was binary: spend another three weeks on structural, environmental, and franchise diligence, or pass. A ± $2M range was sufficient precision for that screen.
What we delivered
In 22 hours we delivered a two-page Snapshot with:
- All-in conversion estimate: $8.4M ± $2.1M (± 25%)
- Per-key mid-point: $87,500
- Top four cost drivers: guestroom FF&E replacement ($2.8M), brand-mandated bathroom reconfiguration to H4 spec ($1.6M), lobby and F&B conversion to H4 market concept ($1.1M), corridor and public-space brand signage ($480k)
- Confidence-range rationale: wider than a typical refresh because H4 conversion triggers involve structural scope the existing Best Western layout didn't anticipate
What happened
The sponsor's underwritten conversion budget was $6.2M. Our mid-point was 35% above that. The range lower bound ($6.3M) just barely touched their underwrite. Given the asymmetric risk — unbudgeted $2M on a 96-key conversion is not a recoverable error — they passed on the LOI and refocused diligence on a second target in the same market.
Why Snapshot was the right tier
A Blueprint-tier line-item estimate would have cost more calendar time than the LOI inspection window allowed, and would have produced the same pass/no-pass decision. Snapshot is built for exactly this moment — the screening step where the downside of being wrong is a canceled LOI, not a mispriced closing.